



httpbis                                                 奥 一穂 (K. Oku)
Internet-Draft                                                    Fastly
Intended status: Standards Track                       26 September 2025
Expires: 30 March 2026


             Protocol for Transposed Transactions over HTTP
                       draft-kazuho-ptth-ptth-00

Abstract

   This document specifies the Protocol for Transposed Transactions over
   HTTP (PTTH), an HTTP extension that allows a backend server to
   establish an HTTP connection to a reverse proxy and transpose HTTP
   request flow.  The reverse proxy then forwards incoming requests to
   the backend server over the transposed connection.  This extension
   lets backend servers behind restrictive firewalls accept HTTP traffic
   through reverse proxies without changing firewall settings and with
   virtually zero overhead.

Discussion Venues

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Discussion of this document takes place on the Protocol for
   Transposed Transactions over HTTP Working Group mailing list
   (ptth@ietf.org), which is archived at
   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ptth/.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/kazuho/draft-unknown-ptth-ptth.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 30 March 2026.



Oku                       Expires 30 March 2026                 [Page 1]

Internet-Draft  Protocol for Transposed Transactions ove  September 2025


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  The Protocol  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.1.  HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.2.  HTTP/3  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   4.  Establishing Authority  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7

1.  Introduction

   In scalable HTTP deployments—such as those using CDNs and dynamic
   backend server pools—clients send requests to reverse proxies, which
   then forward them to backend servers.  Backend servers frequently
   reside behind firewalls that block inbound TCP or QUIC connections,
   requiring special network or firewall configuration to permit proxy-
   initiated traffic.  To overcome these restrictions, some
   organizations use VPNs, but VPNs introduce operational complexity,
   hamper scalability, and impose performance overhead.

   PTTH enables a backend server to establish an HTTP connection to a
   reverse proxy and transpose the flow of HTTP requests so that the
   proxy sends incoming requests back over the same connection.  An HTTP
   request is used for authenticating the backend server and for
   negotiating the scope of requests forwarded to the transposed
   connection, providing flexibility to deployments.




Oku                       Expires 30 March 2026                 [Page 2]

Internet-Draft  Protocol for Transposed Transactions ove  September 2025


   Because PTTH transposes the direction of communication rather than
   encapsulating traffic, it incurs virtually zero overhead and delivers
   high efficiency.

   TODO: expand

2.  Conventions and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

3.  The Protocol

   To set up a transposed connection, the backend server connects to the
   reverse proxy and sends an HTTP request including a URI specifying
   the transposed endpoint and credentials that authenticate the backend
   server.

   The exact form of the URI specifying the transposed endpoint is
   unspecified; it is up to each reverse proxy deployment.

   Similarly, the authentication scheme is unspecified.  Deployments can
   use either a TLS- or an HTTP-based authentication scheme, or
   something else.

   The method being used to establish the transposed connection is
   different between HTTP versions.  However, the HTTP header fields are
   version-independent, and therefore the parameters for negotiating
   PTTH can be defined in a version-neutral manner.

   PTTH cannot originate over HTTP/2.  To establish a transposed HTTP/2
   channel, HTTP/1.1 upgrade is used, with the ALPN specifying HTTP/2.

3.1.  HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2

   To establish a transposed HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2 channel, the backend
   server connects to the reverse proxy using HTTP/1.1 ([HTTP1]), and
   uses the HTTP upgrade mechanism ([HTTP-SEMANTICS] Section 7.8) to
   negotiate the transposition.

   The method of the upgrade request SHALL be "GET", accompanied by an
   "Upgrade: ptth" header field.






Oku                       Expires 30 March 2026                 [Page 3]

Internet-Draft  Protocol for Transposed Transactions ove  September 2025


   The request MUST also include the ALPN header field ([ALPN-HEADER])
   specifying the HTTP versions that the backend server is willing to
   use on the transposed connection.

   Once the transposed connection is established successfully, the
   reverse proxy responds with a 101 (Switching Protocols) response,
   alongside an ALPN response header specifying the HTTP version being
   chosen.  After a 101 response is sent, HTTP requests are sent in the
   direction from the reverse proxy to the backend server.

   Figure 1 shows an exchange of HTTP/1.1 upgrade request and response
   establishing the transposed connection.  In this example, the Basic
   HTTP Authentication Scheme [BASIC-AUTH] is used to authenticate the
   backend server.  As for the application protocol to be used on the
   transposed connection, the backend server is offering both HTTP/2 and
   HTTP/1.1, and the reverse proxy selects HTTP/2.

   GET /reverse-endpoint HTTP/1.1
   Host: example.com
   Connection: upgrade
   Upgrade: ptth
   Authorization: Basic QWxhZGRpbjpvcGVuIHNlc2FtZQ==
   ALPN: h2, http%2F1.1

   HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols
   Connection: upgrade
   Upgrade: ptth
   ALPN: h2

        Figure 1: Establishing a transposed connection over HTTP/1.1

   As the parameters for the transposed connection are exchanged using
   the upgrade request, they cannot be changed once the transposed
   connection is established.  To change those parameters, a new
   HTTP/1.1 connection should be established and transposed.

3.2.  HTTP/3

   In HTTP/3 ([HTTP3]), the OPTIONS method (Section 9.3.7 of
   [HTTP-SEMANTICS]) is used to transpose HTTP request flow on the
   HTTP/3 connection.  As the flow of the existing connection is
   transposed, neither the :protocol pseudo-header field nor the ALPN
   header field is used.

   The target of the OPTIONS request is the endpoint that tranposes the
   connection; therefore, the asterisk ("*") request is never used for
   establishing PTTH.




Oku                       Expires 30 March 2026                 [Page 4]

Internet-Draft  Protocol for Transposed Transactions ove  September 2025


   Once the reverse proxy responds with a 2xx response, it starts
   forwarding HTTP requests on the server-initiated, bidirectional QUIC
   streams.  Note that, due to packet reordering, backend servers might
   receive these requests before receiving a 200 response for the
   OPTIONS request.

   Similarly to when HTTP/1.1 is used, establishment of a new HTTP/3
   connection is required if a transposed HTTP/3 connection with
   different set of parameters is needed.

   Once the connection is transposed, the reverse proxy MAY reset
   incoming requests that it receives using a H3_REQUEST_REJECTED error
   (Section 8.1 of [HTTP3]).

   TODO: Discuss the downsides of transposing an HTTP/3 connection;
   notes:

   *  No issues with SETTINGS; none of the HTTP/3 settings are specific
      to clients or servers.

   *  No issues with QPACK; one set of QPACK streams can handle requests
      flying in both directions.

   *  We need to consider how to handle quarter stream IDs of HTTP/3
      datagrams; but that issue not orthogonal to sending HTTP requests
      in both directions.  The issue arises for any design that
      establishes the QUIC connection in the reverse direction.  Maybe
      the answer here is to use stream_id / 4 + (2 << 60) as the quarter
      stream IDs for datagrams belonging to the transposed requests.

   *  Otherwise, the design does not interfere with WebTransport over
      HTTP/3; for both client- and server-initiated bidirectional
      streams, WebTransport streams can be identified by their signal
      vallues (0x41), and if they are associated to client- or server-
      initiated requests can be determined by their Session ID (i.e.,
      the stream ID of the CONNECT stream).

   *  Rather than using OPTIONS, do we want to use an extended CONNECT?
      While the use of OPTIONS might be fine, HTTP requests without a
      special pseudo-header is end-to-end per definition.  Using an
      extended CONNECT is a straightforward way to constrain the setup
      of a transposed _connection_ to hop-by-hop.

4.  Establishing Authority

   In HTTP, only the URI's authority may process or delegate the request
   (Section 17.1 of [HTTP-SEMANTICS]).




Oku                       Expires 30 March 2026                 [Page 5]

Internet-Draft  Protocol for Transposed Transactions ove  September 2025


   This authority model of HTTP remains unchanged under PTTH:

   *  When the backend server connects to the reverse proxy and requests
      the transposition of the connection, the backend identifies the
      reverse proxy using a target URI whose authority component
      identifies the reverse proxy.

   *  When the reverse proxy forwards requests to the backend over a
      transposed connection, it is merely exercising its rights as the
      authoritative server.  This behavior is identical to forwarding
      requests over connections the reverse proxy initiated, using
      whatever authentication scheme it chooses.  PTTH differs only in
      how the backend connections are established.

5.  Security Considerations

   TODO

6.  IANA Considerations

   Once approved, this document will request IANA to register the
   following entry to the "HTTP Upgrade Tokens" registry maintained at
   https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-upgrade-tokens
   (https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-upgrade-tokens):

   Value:  ptth

   Description:  Establishes a transposed HTTP/1.1 connection.

   Expected Version Tokens:  None

   Reference:  this document

7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [ALPN-HEADER]
              Hutton, A., Uberti, J., and M. Thomson, "The ALPN HTTP
              Header Field", RFC 7639, DOI 10.17487/RFC7639, August
              2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7639>.

   [HTTP-SEMANTICS]
              Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke,
              Ed., "HTTP Semantics", STD 97, RFC 9110,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9110, June 2022,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110>.




Oku                       Expires 30 March 2026                 [Page 6]

Internet-Draft  Protocol for Transposed Transactions ove  September 2025


   [HTTP1]    Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke,
              Ed., "HTTP/1.1", STD 99, RFC 9112, DOI 10.17487/RFC9112,
              June 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112>.

   [HTTP3]    Bishop, M., Ed., "HTTP/3", RFC 9114, DOI 10.17487/RFC9114,
              June 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9114>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

7.2.  Informative References

   [BASIC-AUTH]
              Reschke, J., "The 'Basic' HTTP Authentication Scheme",
              RFC 7617, DOI 10.17487/RFC7617, September 2015,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7617>.

Acknowledgments

   TODO.

Author's Address

   Kazuho Oku
   Fastly
   Email: kazuhooku@gmail.com

   Additional contact information:

      奥 一穂
      Fastly














Oku                       Expires 30 March 2026                 [Page 7]
