



Internet Engineering Task Force                         ssw. Whited, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                               Independent
Intended status: Informational                             16 April 2026
Expires: 18 October 2026


                          Matroska Stem Files
                       draft-swhited-mka-stems-10

Abstract

   This document defines a multi-track profile of the Matroska container
   format for distributing stems.  It is intended to be used by DJ
   applications and Digital Audio Workstations while remaining backwards
   compatible with existing media players.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 18 October 2026.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.








Whited                   Expires 18 October 2026                [Page 1]

Internet-Draft                  MKA Stem                      April 2026


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Versioning  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Track Layout  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.1.  Audio Streams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.2.  Stem Metadata . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   4.  Mastering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  Format Support  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     6.1.  Matroska Tag Names Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     6.2.  Stem Types Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   8.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   9.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9

1.  Introduction

   Stems are recordings of individual instruments, or clusters of
   instruments, used by DJs and music producers for live mixing of
   music.  Historically stems have been stored as individual audio
   files, or using patent-encumbered or vendor specific, proprietary
   container formats.

   A common feature of modern software used by DJs is "dynamic" or
   "live" stem separation where the DJ software attempts to
   algorithmically separate the audio signals in a track to allow the DJ
   to mute, solo, or apply effects to individual instruments.  The
   results of such dynamic separation vary but are, generally speaking,
   noticeably different from the original stems used by the producer and
   frequently contain distortions and other artifacts that sound
   undesirable.  A better model is to have the producer release the
   original stems along with the original track.  This allows the final
   mix to sound closer to the producers original vision for the track,
   even while it is being remixed and re-interpreted by a DJ or another
   artist.

   This specification documents a profile for the Matroska container
   format [RFC9559] that allows it to store the final mix for a track
   alongside the lossless or lossy stems used to mix the track in a
   single file.  The target consumer of these stem files are DJ
   applications meant for live remixing and performance, as well as
   Digital Audio Workstations (DAWs) used by producers who want their
   music to be remixed.




Whited                   Expires 18 October 2026                [Page 2]

Internet-Draft                  MKA Stem                      April 2026


1.1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

2.  Versioning

   Files that meet the criteria of this document MUST have a global
   UTF-8 tag with the name "STEM_VERSION" with the value "1.0".  The
   presence of this tag indicates that this is a stem file and the value
   indicates compatibility with this document.  The value may or may not
   be changed in the future if new versions of this format are created.

3.  Track Layout

3.1.  Audio Streams

   Each stem file may contain an arbitrary number of tracks containing
   audio and MUST include at least three audio tracks (the mixed audio
   and at least two stems).  For stem files meant for live DJ use, it is
   RECOMMENDED that four or fewer stem tracks be used (as opposed to
   stem files meant for music production or non-live remixing where a
   DAW may utilize a significantly larger number of tracks).

   For ease of decoding each track SHOULD be encoded using the same
   codec with the same parameters including bitrate, and sample rate.
   Stems are often recorded with a single channel and only the final mix
   is in stereo.  For stem files that are meant to be re-mixed by a DAW
   this is fine, but DJs may want to maintain a similar balance and
   channel layout to the original track.  Stems MAY have a different
   channel count or layout than the main audio track, however it is
   RECOMMENDED that all stem tracks maintain the same channel count and
   layout as the main track and have the same channel balance as their
   component parts in the final mix.  For example, if the final mix is a
   stereo track that contains a fiddle that is 75% in the right channel
   and only 25% in the left channel, the stem track for the fiddle would
   also be in stereo with the stem mostly appearing from the right
   channel as in the final mix.

   The first track containing audio data MUST be the final post-mix
   audio in the default language (the mixdown track).  All mixdown
   tracks regardless of language MUST have the Matroska "Default" flag
   set to "1" ([RFC9559], Section 18.1, 5.1.4.1.5).  This helps preserve
   backwards compatibility in media players which do not support this
   format which typically play the first audio stream found or may



Whited                   Expires 18 October 2026                [Page 3]

Internet-Draft                  MKA Stem                      April 2026


   select based on the default flag.  In addition, the "Enabled" flag
   for any mixdown tracks MUST be set to "1" ([RFC9559],
   Section 5.1.4.1.4).

   The remaining audio tracks will be individual stems and MUST have the
   same effective length as the mixdown track such that playing each
   stem track from the beginning would result in roughly the same audio
   (excluding the final stages of mastering) as the final mix present in
   the mixdown track.  For example, if the original track is three
   minutes long and the stem file includes a percussion track but the
   percussion does not start until minute two, the percussion stem would
   still be three minutes long but would contain a minute of silence at
   the start of the track, or would have a block timestamp ([RFC9559],
   Section 10) that sets the effective start time to one minute.

   Each stem track MUST have the Matroska "Default" flag set to "0" and
   MUST have the "Enabled" flag set to "0".

   When creating the file the stem tracks SHOULD NOT have any intra-stem
   gain normalization applied to bring the stems up to the same
   perceived volume.  Instead they should retain the same levels as they
   would have in the final mix present in the mixdown track so that if
   all stems were played at unity gain the overall level would be
   equivalent to the level of the final mix.

   On playback, DJ software MAY choose to normalize the gain on any
   combination of stems currently being played to make it equivalent to
   the mixdown track or any other tracks being mixed in even if some
   stems are muted or have their individual gains adjusted.  However,
   the exact mixing behavior of DJ applications is outside the scope of
   this specification.

3.2.  Stem Metadata

   For each stem track a tag ([RFC9559], Section 5.1.8) SHOULD also be
   set with its target set to the stem track and a tag name of
   "STEM_COLOR".  The tag value must be a string in RGB hex format set
   to a color representing the stem (ie. #145374).













Whited                   Expires 18 October 2026                [Page 4]

Internet-Draft                  MKA Stem                      April 2026


   Each stem track MUST set the value of the track "Name" element
   ([RFC9559], Section 5.1.4.1.18) to a short, human-meaningful, track
   name for the stem that describes its contents, for example
   "Percussion" or "Vocals".  These names are intended for display in
   playback applications and therefore should remain concise, but no
   specific format is defined.  The track Name element MAY also be
   duplicated or overridden as a tag, in which case the order of
   precedence from Section 24.1 of [RFC9559] SHOULD be respected.  The
   maximum length of the name string (whether in the "Name" field or a
   tag) MUST NOT be longer than 20 bytes.

   The free-text "Name" field provides a label that is backwards
   compatible with existing software that supports Matroska, but does
   not necessarily provide enough information for DJ software
   implementing this format.  Some software uses pre-defined stems (ie.
   always has "Vocal", "Melody", "Bass", and "Drum" stems), but the name
   is free-text and may not exactly match the name of the specific stem
   in that software.  Or the software may want to display icons that
   represent each stem, or display translations in a language that is
   not already embedded in the files "Name" tags.  For example, in most
   tracks with words there might be a stem with its name set to "Vocals"
   but another track may call it "Singer" or a traditional called folk
   dance track might name it "Caller".  Software for stem playback might
   want to show a Microphone icon next to each of these tracks.  To help
   map stems to individual icons or controller buttons, a binary tag
   with the name "STEM_TYPE" and a target of the stem track MAY be added
   to the file.  The value of this tag is an unsigned 64-bit integer
   from the IANA Stem Types Registry, the initial contents of which are
   defined in Section 6.2.

4.  Mastering

   Because the final stages of mastering happens post-mix and the stems
   are pre-mix audio the stem tracks SHOULD NOT have the final post-mix
   mastering steps applied (including any final compression or limiter
   steps).  This means that a DJ playing the track using the stem tracks
   instead of the mixdown track will result in different audio from the
   final mix.  This is deemed an acceptable trade off since the final
   sound of the DJs version of a track is likely to be significantly
   different from what the original track producer had created either
   way.  Even without the final mastering steps this method still gives
   the producer more control over the final sound than if the DJ were to
   use an auto stem separation algorithm.

   Other mastering steps MAY be applied to the stems as well as to the
   final mix at the mastering engineers discretion.





Whited                   Expires 18 October 2026                [Page 5]

Internet-Draft                  MKA Stem                      April 2026


5.  Format Support

   The Matroska container format can store many types of audio, not all
   of which are suitable for DJing or music production.  To ensure
   compatibility between playback and encoding applications the
   following formats SHOULD be supported depending on the use case of
   the software as shown in the following table.  Formats with the use
   case "Live remixing" are intended largely for playback applications
   meant for live performance (ie.  DJ software).  Formats with the use
   case "Music production" are intended to be distributed for remixing
   in a non-live setting (ie. with a DAW or music tracker).

    +===========+==================+=================================+
    | Codec     | Use Case         | Codec ID                        |
    +===========+==================+=================================+
    | FLAC      | Live remixing,   | A_FLAC [RFC9639], Section 10.2  |
    | [RFC9639] | Music production |                                 |
    +-----------+------------------+---------------------------------+
    | Opus      | Live remixing    | A_OPUS [I-D.ietf-cellar-codec], |
    | [RFC6716] |                  | Section 3.4.32                  |
    +-----------+------------------+---------------------------------+

                       Table 1: Audio codec support

6.  IANA Considerations

6.1.  Matroska Tag Names Registry

   This memo modifies the "Matroska Tag Names" registry defined in
   Section 6.1 of [I-D.ietf-cellar-tags] to add the following values:

         +==============+==========+============================+
         | Tag Name     | Tag Type | Reference                  |
         +==============+==========+============================+
         | STEM_VERSION | UTF-8    | This document, Section 2   |
         +--------------+----------+----------------------------+
         | STEM_COLOR   | UTF-8    | This document, Section 3.2 |
         +--------------+----------+----------------------------+
         | STEM_TYPE    | binary   | This document, Section 3.2 |
         +--------------+----------+----------------------------+

         Table 2: Additions to the "Matroska Tag Names" Registry

6.2.  Stem Types Registry

   IANA will create a new registry called the "Stem Types Registry".





Whited                   Expires 18 October 2026                [Page 6]

Internet-Draft                  MKA Stem                      April 2026


   To register a new Stem Type in the registry a unique unsigned 64-bit
   integer ID, Description, and an optional reference to a document
   describing the stem type are required.

   The initial values of the Stem Types Registry are as follows:

         +======+====================================+===========+
         | ID   | Description                        | Reference |
         +======+====================================+===========+
         | 0x01 | Stems that contain sung vocals.    | This      |
         |      |                                    | document  |
         +------+------------------------------------+-----------+
         | 0x02 | Stems that contain spoken vocals   | This      |
         |      | including traditional dance calls, | document  |
         |      | or spoken words over a tune.       |           |
         +------+------------------------------------+-----------+
         | 0x03 | Stem that contains the melody      | This      |
         |      | (regardless of instrument)         | document  |
         +------+------------------------------------+-----------+
         | 0x04 | Stems that include bass elements   | This      |
         |      | (regardless of instrument)         | document  |
         +------+------------------------------------+-----------+
         | 0x05 | General percussion                 | This      |
         |      |                                    | document  |
         +------+------------------------------------+-----------+
         | 0x06 | Synths                             | This      |
         |      |                                    | document  |
         +------+------------------------------------+-----------+

           Table 3: Initial Contents of the "Stem Types" Registry

7.  Security Considerations

   This document inherits security considerations from both [RFC8794]
   and [RFC9559].  It does not have additional security considerations.

8.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.





Whited                   Expires 18 October 2026                [Page 7]

Internet-Draft                  MKA Stem                      April 2026


   [RFC9559]  Lhomme, S., Bunkus, M., and D. Rice, "Matroska Media
              Container Format Specification", RFC 9559,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9559, October 2024,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9559>.

9.  Informative References

   [RFC6716]  Valin, JM., Vos, K., and T. Terriberry, "Definition of the
              Opus Audio Codec", RFC 6716, DOI 10.17487/RFC6716,
              September 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6716>.

   [RFC8794]  Lhomme, S., Rice, D., and M. Bunkus, "Extensible Binary
              Meta Language", RFC 8794, DOI 10.17487/RFC8794, July 2020,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8794>.

   [RFC9639]  van Beurden, M.Q.C. and A. Weaver, "Free Lossless Audio
              Codec (FLAC)", RFC 9639, DOI 10.17487/RFC9639, December
              2024, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9639>.

   [I-D.ietf-cellar-codec]
              Lhomme, S., Bunkus, M., and D. Rice, "Matroska Media
              Container Codec Specifications", Work in Progress,
              Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-cellar-codec-18, 12 April 2026,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cellar-
              codec-18>.

   [I-D.ietf-cellar-tags]
              Lhomme, S., Bunkus, M., and D. Rice, "Matroska Media
              Container Tag Specifications", Work in Progress, Internet-
              Draft, draft-ietf-cellar-tags-23, 26 February 2026,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cellar-
              tags-23>.

Acknowledgements

   Thanks to the members of #matroska on the libera.chat IRC network,
   and to mosu and JanC in particular, for patiently explaining the
   basics of the format to me and for all their feedback.

   Thanks also to the members of the Ardour forums for their feedback on
   DAWs and mastering.

   Thanks to the developers of Mixxx and the members of the Mixxx forums
   for pointing out the potential pain points for DJ software.

   Finally, thanks to the members of the IETF CELLAR working group,
   especially Steve Lhomme, for their feedback.




Whited                   Expires 18 October 2026                [Page 8]

Internet-Draft                  MKA Stem                      April 2026


Author's Address

   Sam Whited (editor)
   Independent
   Email: sam@samwhited.com
   URI:   https://blog.samwhited.com













































Whited                   Expires 18 October 2026                [Page 9]
